In Conversation with Simon West OBE, Executive Director GTA

Back to blog

Facing Delays: How Firearms Trade Businesses are Impacted by Licensing Issues

Many of you have kindly filled out my survey on the RFD licensing service across the UK.  My main aim is to get data on how the police are performing in each force to support the debate in the Fees Working Group at the Home Office.  If you haven’t filled it in – please do so now.

It takes just five minutes and the data is critical to our future.  https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/LYGBKSM

There is a study ongoing now in ten forces to determine the true costs of licensing.  Then they plan to charge ‘full cost recovery’ to certificate holders and RFDs.  While we might be happy to pay for a good service, I consider it a poor time to be asking for more when so many forces are way behind on their statutory duty to provide licences.

Many of you have been in touch with me about the effects of delays in police issuing grants and variations – some are well over 12 months behind where they should be.  I am aware of the effects of such delays and the real impact on your businesses.  I am working with the British Shooting Sports Council to get action at a national level to improve the service.

The data I am getting through our survey is producing some interesting results.  I will share that with you soon.  As you would expect there is plenty of variation from force to force but I am pleased that many of you have reported that you have not faced too many difficulties.  I hope this is because of the pressure we put on to ensure that RFDs should be prioritised during the pandemic.  That said, there are some strong examples of poor service – both in terms of timeliness and the knowledge held by individual FEOs.   This is something I will be representing at the Fees Working Group.  We cannot afford to accept a cost model based on inefficiency.

In fact, at a time of such delays in certificate issues, it will be hard for any of the shooting organisations involved to accept any increase in costs before a proper service is restored.

Please help by filling in the survey and I will ensure you are properly represented.

We all seek to achieve the highest professional standards – which in the world of firearms legislation is a constant challenge.  I have very much enjoyed seeing so many of you on our RFD Training Courses at Bisley and around the country.  I am delighted we have also started seeing police licensing representatives on the course.  This is one of the ways we can help them help us.  Establishing a proper level of FEO understanding of how the trade operates is central to the professional trusted relationship we all desire.  We take the course to Scotland at the end of this month, then Bisley and Cambridge later in the year.  If you haven’t had a recent update on all the complexity we face, I would very much recommend it to you.

While I’m on the matter of trade knowledge, do check with the GTA if you sense you are being asked to meet demands from licensing that you’re not sure about.  I answer some interesting calls each week and it’s useful to get feedback on what’s going on.  Sometimes the request is fair – sometimes not.

  • Recent examples include the need for RFDs to keep their register for 30 years – WRONG – just 5 – it is the police that has to keep a 30-year record on NFLMS.
  • RFDs need to move to an electronic register – WRONG.  Paper or electronic is still acceptable.  We may see change in the future but it is unlikely before the new police computer upgrade.

We are in the final throws of fitting out the Bisley HQ as a proper home for the Trade.  Soon members will be able to make use of the facilities for a quick pop-in or bigger events.  We will be providing PIN code access shortly.  With a range of layout options, it is suitable for meetings, training sessions and social events.  Living alongside other organisations like the NRA, CPSA and NSRA and having access to the ranges – rifle and clay – really helps feel the benefits of being a resident at the National Shooting Centre.   We don’t occupy the building full time but we are often there if you want a look.  Just let the team know and we can be there to show you around.

Thankfully, we are facing some warmer weather and the game fair and show season.   Scotland, Wales, Ragley and a series of county events are all approaching fast.  At Ragley, we will be running the Gunmakers’ Theatre again and thanks to some enthusiastic volunteers we have got a great line-up of presenters.  Bill Blacker, Diggory Hadoke, Gavin Gardner, Mark Osborne, Daryn Hufton Rees, Simon Reinhold, Dave Mills and others will all be on call to educate and entertain.  Lin, Kerry and I will be there too, so you have a chance to engage with us face-to-face and give us feedback on how life is on the front line.

With plenty of ongoing work on the lead ammunition restriction, fees, banks, transport, insurance and the like I hope we manage to get there!

Other News Posts

In Conversation with Simon West OBE, Executive Director GTA

Back to blog

Shooting Sports in the UK: Embracing Diversity and Facing Challenges

After choosing to go out stalking yesterday, rather than engage with writing this article, I feel better placed to set this coming year in context.

I often comment to outsiders about how diverse our businesses are.  We have heritage crafts through to high-end tech; we have multinational companies and one-man bands.  We support the rural economy and farmers by providing valuable leisure time for urban professionals.  Our customers themselves can view beauty in so many ways – some in the shine of walnut matched with exquisite hand engraving – while others demand matt-black picatinny extrusions.  Some have deep technical knowledge to support their interests; others just claim so.

But facing us all are the same threats and opportunities.  It’s my job to try and provide some strategic viewpoint on what’s important for the coming year.  That’s where time in the field helps.

There are some areas of our industry that face little or no public criticism.  Guns in the hands of professionals are seen as necessary.  The Armed Forces and Law Enforcement obviously.  The public still doesn’t like the idea of bobby being armed – but they do want an armed response vehicle close and available.  Our trade should take credit for providing our front line armed with the best kit.

Behind the front line, we have the reserve – and that’s not just people in uniform.  Society needs to support marksmanship.  My experience is from the Army, and I can remember a series of pre-deployment training packages where the demands of operational shooting standards put a serious burden on the training teams and the soldiers themselves.  Those who had the experience of shooting from their early years were natural’s.   Whether it had been in cadet corps or even plinking with airguns, their skills had been developed in those rich early years and they were key instinctive shooters.  There are few professional sharpshooters and snipers who did not have early exposure to shooting.

That’s where families, youth organisations, clubs and our national associations like the NRA and NSRA do so much good for society.  It’s often forgotten but there is a reason for the provision of instruction and facilities for marksmanship.

‘Professional’ may then be extended to some other callings.  Certainly, there is little current objection to the control of deer populations.  Those professionals employed in controlling pests that influence the environment – and have a need to use guns – have public support.

My stalking is part of quite a challenging deer management operation.  I do it as a volunteer.  That should count as well.  And so should those people who support estate management plans – even if they pay for the privilege.

In some areas, we need all the help we can get.

Let’s not forget shotgun shooting.  The investment our customers make in live quarry shooting provides the underpinning model that has allowed our country to enjoy the rich biodiversity we have in the countryside.  Land managed for shooting benefits hugely from the investments made in conserving habitats for our wildlife.  We must champion the excellent work of GWCT.  Their scientific evidence of how nature really benefits from game and wildlife management needs to be understood and publicised by all who shoot.

And so, to clay shooting.  The pandemic lockdowns served well to remind society of the benefits of being outdoors and meeting with friends.  There are approximately 600,000 shotgun certificate holders in the UK.  If only half of these shooters shoot clays – that’s 300,000!  We often hear that angling has high figures – but the stats show angling attracts a modest 100,000.  Clay and target shooting is providing a self-disciplined, self-betterment, outdoor, competitive, and social activity to a significant section of society – this is something to celebrate.

Now is the time to embrace all that is good in shooting.   While some of our big shooting organisations are fixed on dealing with specific threats, it’s worth the Trade taking up the opportunity to look more broadly.  We have the advantage of seeing shooting from every angle.  We see parents introducing their children to new skills, pensioners defeating loneliness in airgun clubs, and experts developing their equipment to be better marksmen.  It’s a broad church and one where we should celebrate shooting’s diversity.  There really is something for everyone.

But I talked about threats – there are plenty of them.  As I organise the GTA’s activities for the coming year, I have made a list of those topics that will take up our time.

The pandemic is not yet at an end and we are seeing a new wave of licensing departments referring to Omicron as another reason to slow the processing of grants and renewals.  Some are better than others, but many are also finding it a challenge to review their processes to consider last November’s new Statutory Guidance.  Neither are acceptable and I am working with the British Shooting Sports Council to demand a better service.

Global supply issues have not gone away.  There are improvements in some areas but it could be another year before we see improvements in the delivery of some stock items.  I am working with other gun trade associations around the globe with meetings at SHOT Show and IWA to understand the issues and then engage with the government to see what can be done to mitigate the problems.

It’s almost a year since we submitted our response to the Government’s Firearms Safety consultation.  The Home Office is still working on it but we should expect legislative activity around security for high muzzle energy firearms, airgun safety, 11(4) ranges and reloading in the coming months.

The Environment Agency and other government bodies continue to study the lead in ammunition topic.  We are engaged and there will be plenty more on this in my communication with you in the coming months.  Contrary to some uninformed opinions, there is no imminent ban.  I will be re-engaging with the National Game Dealers Association to ensure we don’t score any own goals by them trying to precipitate one either.

Often the public perception of guns in society is influenced by the use of guns in crime.   I am working with a number of law enforcement bodies, including the NCA, on how we might be able to help deal with this threat to society and will be coming to you with requests to help.

And we still await the report on the incident in Plymouth last year.  That is bound to have repercussions.  The shooting organisations are working closely together, through BSSC, to ensure the effects are proportionate and focussed.

We live in interesting times.  We have lots to celebrate together with plenty of challenges.  Our strengths will serve us well to be able to deal with the headwinds we face.  Thank you for what you do in your meetings with customers to pass on the word.

Let’s all work together to publicise the great services that shooting provides across the country and ensure that we maintain our freedoms to operate safe and responsible businesses that provide a service to society.

All the best!

Other News Posts

In Conversation with Simon West OBE, Executive Director GTA

Back to blog

Lead in Ammunition: Industry’s Struggle and Government’s Transition Period

Well, after an anxious wait, we finally received the two key reports to submit to the Government’s consultation on Lead in Ammunition.

Cranfield University’s School of Supply Chain Management and Blake International, specialist consultants, were asked to complete independent assessments on the time it would take our four major cartridge manufacturers to be able to switch their production to lead-free.  As you will remember, the HSE has proposed an eighteen-month transition period after enactment – which is planned for next year.

As we have been reporting for some time, the impacts of the pandemic and the resulting global supply chain issues, together with the war in Ukraine, have meant that sourcing ammunition components is harder than ever.  The double-based powders normally used in steel cartridges are the same as military propellants that are being diverted for the re-arming of NATO and beyond.  Furthermore, I would never have known that the steel in cartridge heads used to come from the besieged Mariupol steel factory.  Keeping up with the normal production of lead ammunition is currently a challenge too.

Both reports are clear.  The 18-month transition period is unfeasible.  The steel shot ammunition you have seen so far, has been loaded on traditional machines at slow rates – nothing that would facilitate full-scale production.  For that we need machines, specially constructed to deal with the increased risk of loading steel.  The order books for these rather niche machines are full and delivery can take years. Our companies are already investing and working towards increased production.

So – how long?  Well, Cranfield University, a world-renowned source of expertise in business management say at least 4 ½ years.  Dr Peter Hurley of Blake International, who has extensive experience in ammunition matters, reports potentially 6+ years.

The ball is now in the HSE court.  We have made the clear point that they should always have been engaging with the industry to collect facts – not deal in speculation.  The imposition of an unwarranted 18-month transition would affect us all.  Nationally, we consume 260 million cartridges a year for both game and clay.  The industry is working flat out but they won’t be able to provide what we need – and not for years.  Actually, business survival is at risk.

We won’t be sleeping.  The message now needs to get to politicians and we need to hold Therese Coffey to account.  It’s her signature, as Secretary of State for DEFRA, that goes on the restriction.  We cannot allow our world-leading manufacturers to suffer from the ignorance of officials.

………………..

I attend a series of meetings with the government on your behalf and I am picking up snippets about the replacement for the National Firearms Licensing Management System (NFLMS), that the police use to manage guns and certificate holders.  It certainly needs it.  The topic of concern is the Home Office seem to be planning to extend the system to RFDs to cover registers.  This won’t happen quickly and will need changes to legislation but establishing a national firearms database that includes RFD holdings is a dramatic change to the way we currently work.  It has a number of implications that require debate.  A couple of years ago, when the replacement was suggested, I spoke to the IT project team and discussed various advantages and disadvantages of such a system.

Yes, it could simplify customer administration and the notification process but it would also facilitate more intrusive examination of stock levels by licensing departments, let alone disrupt the IT systems you might now be using.  Your software solutions for your register may link to sales platforms, financial accounting etc.   Those linkages are unlikely to be built into the new system.

I will be challenging the Home Office and Chief Constable Debra Tedds, the Chair of the Firearms and Explosives Licensing Working Group for more information at a meeting on 22 November.  They appear to have ambitions that could radically affect our lives and have not yet properly included us in the process.   I will make it clear that they have failed to consult and need to do so.

What I need now is your opinion.  Some of you might delight in being provided with a free online register provided by the police.  As the customer leaves the shop, the gun has already been transferred onto his certificate and tracking is automated.  No longer would we have the problem of  ‘lost’ guns that fall between the cracks.  For others, this might feel like a step too far.   The overzealous licensing officer might track your holdings on a daily basis and get excited about what he considers is ‘trading to a substantial extent’.  If your register is integrated with other systems, that may be lost and you could find yourselves having to run parallel systems with massive additional administration.  Benefits the police but an unnecessary toll on the life of the RFD.

Think about the idea now, talk about it and let me know what you think.  I will get more details of their ambitions and keep you informed.  With GTN, we will collect data from you with a survey of opinions.  Our regulators may be keeping quiet on this because they’re frightened of our opinion.

No longer.  This is now on the radar!

Other News Posts